Somehow, today's blog is a mix of "he said, she said" and the Hatfield vs McCoy debate. Chances are, you have heard the story about two families fighting over who basically is right and who is wrong or who is better than the other. I just found it so interesting how that well known battle of those two families can be tweaked into becoming applicable to the battle of the sexes. Men vs Women.....
I can recall as far back as my childhood the feeling of a serious dividing line between things. You can say it is like playing a game that has only two teams. Boys and girls have always been different. Not just physically, but mentally. What one sees as nothing serious of an infraction can be seen as something totally criminal by the other. It is the battle of whits that sucks people into having what I call the Rationality Blindness Factor. That being blind to rationality is a person's ability to see things as only how they can see it and refuses to consider any other possible scenario. A majority of battles between men and women is basically summed up to relating. You see, men (or boys if you choose) happen to have a very different outlook on things compared to women (or girls). Men live in the moment, their demands are quite simple. It is divided up into three categories..... Food, drink, or (in the nicest way possible to say this) physical pleasure. Deep thought about feelings are really not a prevalent thing in their DNA. Women, on the other hand, are emotional creatures. We are more in tune with deeper connections and feelings. Women strive on complexities. We are inquisitive creatures, but very hard to figure out. Once you do find your match, it is quite easy to see that communication gets even more complex.
As I stated before. Men strive on the basics. They do not read minds, they do not communicate really well about feelings, they see things as they are with zero interest in wanting to know more. I guess the best way to phrase it is.... "It is what it is. What I see is what I see. If I don't see a problem with it, neither should you. Work is stressful enough, so why stress over trivial crap when it is time for fun."
Women, as stated before are ones to dig deeper into situations and tend to react to things that men can't see. It can be about any action, reaction, inaction, or even word or phrase used that can send a woman into a complete tirade of frustration and aggravation. Sadly men lack the ability to smooth over a problem when the request was placed in their lap. It can take something as simple as listening to why what they did was so wrong, understanding the other's point of view, and maybe apologizing for the infraction. The sad part of this is there are ones that decide in order to avoid the confrontation, they will apologize with promises to never do it again and somehow manage to repeat the unacceptable act again and again. In fact, I know of one person that can walk in the door, knowing that he is in trouble and apologize right away without wanting to hear why his actions are unacceptable for the umpteenth time. Men do listen, but they do have a choice to not follow through with promises. Well, that and the ability to keep those damn blinders on when it comes to seeing another's point of view. I will admit that women have that same option.
Here is a simple he said, she said argument to really drive this concept home.....
A man and a woman are out on a date. The man somehow got ahead of the woman and proceeded to walk through the door without holding it open for his date. His date, being roughly a dozen steps behind manages to catch up with her date to have the door slam shut in front of her. The woman, knowing that this is rude behavior towards her, she decides to share her feelings about that situation. He could have easily waited for her to catch up and hold the door for her, but did not want to wait. His defense..... "Well, if you were behind me, I would have held the door for you, but I am not a doorman to hold that door until you finally get there. I do not see it as being such a big deal. You are capable of opening the door yourself." Her defense... "You knew I was behind you, but you did not even look for me. You walked in the door and left be behind. That is just rude behavior to me and I did not appreciate it. I would like an apology from you for being inconsiderate of me because my feelings were hurt." Yet again, the man does not listen and repeats his defense that she needed to keep up with him. If not... it is a free world and she can open the door herself.
Men see things as if it his buddy hanging out with him. If his buddy does not get bent over holding the door for them... well, neither should she. Bad thought process when you are in a relationship, but that is what men see relationships are. The only real difference men will tell you about their relationships and friendships is that relationships are friendships with "benefits".
Now, if only women can see their relationships as platonic friendships where feelings are not a real factor, but have "benefits", so to speak.... Men would have less infractions because she would not care so much. Oh, what am I thinking!!! We never even crossed the threshold of how words can have a multitude of meanings. I guess I can save that for another time :)
Have a great day everyone!!